Archive for April, 2005

The Relative Importance of Baseball

Saturday, April 9th, 2005

Baseball is something very important to me. I have lived and died and finally ascended to nirvana with the Red Sox, and was looking forward to their new season as Champions with great anticipation (and some dread, but that’s another story), until a few weeks ago, when something happened.

My Dad, who turned 83 on the same day as the Victory Parade, has been in just miserable health all winter. No energy, joint pain, sleepless nights, trouble breathing. He went to a new doctor, the old one being far too fond of just prescribing nasty pills, and we discovered that my poor Dad was suffering with a really shockingly bad case of congestive heart failure. He was immediately admitted to the best nearby hospital and underwent open heart surgery to install a new aortic valve this past Thursday.

So what does this have to do with baseball?

Well, for one thing, it dropped baseball back to its proper place, that of mere entertainment, not a matter of “life or death.” But at the same time…

Baseball, and the anticipation of baseball, got Dad through many days this spring training season when he would otherwise have just laid in bed all day. He really got into the meaningless and hard-to-follow games, where the starters were replaced after the 5th inning, and it was during these games when he seemed energized and either happy (when the Sox were winnning) or disgusted (when they were losing), and we got into some really animated conversations on how we thought the team would fare this year.

April 3rd was Opening Night, and Dad just about counted the hours until game time. He got his dish of snacks ready, and fresh popcorn, and poured a drink, and for the fist six innings he was energetic, cheering and groaning (unfortunately, the latter more than the former) until his shallow pool of energy ran out and he snoozed through the last few innings. When we woke him after the game was over, he scowled. “Did the damn Yankees win?” he asked.

On Monday the 4th, he met the cardiologist and was admitted to the hospital, and underwent some tests the next day. He told me not to bother coming to visit that day, as in the first place, he wouldn’t be available to visit much, being hauled around between the catheterization lab and other examinations, and secondly, there was game that day and he wanted me to watch it for him and tell him what was happening. He was very disappointed to hear of the Sox’s second straight loss to New York, but soon moved on to the issue of his failing heart valve.

Wednesday he was also hauled around from pillar to post in preparation for Thursday’s surgery, so once again asked me to keep tabs on the Sox for him, which I did, very distractedly. I spoke with him in the evening, after Mariano Rivera had blown the save and the Sox had won handily, and he was delighted to hear the news. Then he asked me to bring Mom up to the hospital while he was undergoing surgery then next day.

We arrived at his bedside the next morning, and when I told him about Rivera’s troubles and A-Rod’s juggling act at 3rd base, how he laughed, and rubbed his hands together. “Well good!” he said, delighted. He scowled and shook his head when I told him how the NY fans had booed their brilliant closer off the field, and even as we waited in the “induction room”, with anesthesiologists running around and lots of technicians and nurses and doctors dashing to and fro, and IV lines attached, and the prospect of a horrifically frightening surgery ahead… Dad still asked if there was a game, and would I please record all the games for him to watch when he got home.

While Mom and I waited in the surgery waiting room (a room full of bad vibes if there ever was one), I thought of how Dad and I had watched the playoffs and the World Series together, and all the other games of previous years — the dull wins and shrugging losses, the come-from-behind wins in extra innings that had us both laughing and cheering, and the blown saves, and the terrible crushing defeats that left us feeling miserable for days. How he had laughed and cheered when Big Papi had brought home the wins in Games 4 and 5, the unkind things he had to say about The Slap in Game 6, and the big grin on his grizzled face when the Sox blew the doors off the Yanks in Game 7. Then the World Series, and how Dad had hugged me when the Sox had finally, finally won it all…

I was thinking of these things as I waited in that dark, tense room, and thought of the dreadful “what if’s” that everyone thinks when they sit there, surrounded by other terrified people, facing terrible situations.

The news that came to my family was all good. Dad came through the surgery with flying colors, and today, 2 days later, is sitting up, walking, having good meals… and watching baseball. He scowled at the TV today and asked aloud just why Wells was still in there, and why they let Lowe go in the first place.

Baseball is important. Not even faintly as important as my Dad, of course, but it’s there. It’s part of his daily routine, and is something he cares about. He knows the world does not revolve around the Red Sox; he knows it’s just a game. But it is not insignificant to him, and to us as a family.

Baseball is not life. It is not “do or die.” We know that now more than ever. But there is a deeper connection to The Game that we all feel, one of the many common threads running through our family, binding us together. It is like a landmark we can look to, even in a dire and scary situation like Dad’s illness. Dad looked to it himself even as he was staring surgery in the face, and is looking forward to seeing the rest of this season, and lots more after it. It has meaning for him, and for all of us, and so I know that baseball is not trivial, or insignificant, or “only a game.”

Here’s to my Dad, and to the team and The Game which he loves.

Baseball and the Royal Wedding

Friday, April 8th, 2005

Kamuela, HI April 7, 2005 – Baseball season started earlier this week and it has a relation, literally, to the royal wedding scheduled for later this week.

The Family Forest® has now calculated the Kevin Bacon style six-degrees-of-separation family ties of both the bride and the groom to thousands of the most recognized names from recorded history. One of them is the person credited as the father of baseball, Civil War General Abner Doubleday.

As the chart at http://www.familyforest.com/Royal_Wedding.html shows, General Doubleday is a 15th cousin twice removed of Prince Charles and a 24th cousin twice removed of Camilla Parker-Bowles.

That chart is only a starting point. It means that in the Family Forest® one can visually point-and-click travel through maps of generation-by-generation family ties that connect all of the people on the chart in surprising ways. For instance, an earlier wedding set the stage for the royal wedding scheduled on April 9, 2005.

Hanging in the Philadelphia Museum of Art is a famous painting called “The Marriage of Constantine” (Emperor Constantine the Great on the chart, a 42nd great-grandfather of Prince Charles and a 44th great-grandfather of Camilla Parker-Bowles) by the Dutch master Peter Paul Rubens (a 35th great-grandson of Emperor Constantine the Great, a half 11th cousin 12 times removed of Prince Charles and a half 11th cousin 13 times removed of Camilla Parker-Bowles).

For a couple of other examples, Bill Gates was recently knighted by the groom’s mother. He is a 14th cousin once removed of Prince Charles and a 14th cousin of Camilla Parker-Bowles. Tom Hanks, star of Sony’s upcoming The Da Vinci Code movie, is also related to both Prince Charles (13th cousin) and Camilla Parker-Bowles (12th cousin once removed).

Prominent media personalities are also related, such as New York Times publisher Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., (9th cousin twice removed of Prince Charles and a 21st cousin 4 times removed of Camilla Parker-Bowles) and Doonesbury creator Garry Trudeau (15th cousin once removed of Prince Charles and an 18th cousin of Camilla Parker-Bowles).

If such a wide ranging group of people as those on the chart are related to Prince Charles and Camilla Parker-Bowles, who else shares ancestors with them?

Millisecond Publishing Company, Inc. is the home of the Family Forest® Project, and the latest state-of-the-art presentation is the Family Forest® Leadership Edition.

Contact: Millisecond Publishing Company, Inc.
Kristine M. Harrison
www.familyforest.com
kristine@FamilyForest.com
808-885-717

Mickey Mantle, Tape Measure Shot, April 17,1953

Monday, April 4th, 2005

Mel Allen always had a way with words. Here is his call of the epic Mickey Mantle home run:

Yogi Berra on first. Mickey at bat with the count of no strikes. Left-handed pitcher Chuck Stobbs on the mound. Mantle, a switch-hitter batting right-handed, digs in the plate. Here’s the pitch . . . Mantle swings. . . there’s a tremendous drive going into deep left field! It’s going, going, it’s over the bleachers and over the sign atop of the bleachers into the yards of houses across the street! It’s got to be one of the longest home runs I’ve ever seen hit. How about that! . . .we have just learned that Yankee publicity director Red Patterson is going to go out there to see how far that ball actually did go.”

Washington outfielders at Griffith Stadium never moved. Only twice before had a ball ever been hit over the Griffith leftfield wall - once by Joe DiMaggio and once by Jimmie Foxx. Their shots, however, bounced in the seats before clearing the last barrier.

Mantle’s shot blasted toward left center, where the base of the bleachers wall was 391 feet from the plate. The distance to the back of the wall was sixty-nine feet more. A football scoreboard was atop Mickey blasted the ball toward left center, where the base of the bleachers wall is 391 feet from the plate. The distance to the back of the wall is sixty-nine feet more and then the back wall is fifth feet high. Atop that wall is a football scoreboard. The ball struck about five feet above the wall, caromed off to the right and flew out of sight.

Donald Dunaway, ten years old, scrambled over the fence and was the first to get to the ball. Close behind was Yankee publicity director Arthur E. Patterson.

“Lookout!” Yankee third base coach Frank Crosetti, screamed at Mantle. Billy Martin stayed at third base and pretended to tag up. Mickey ran the bases with his head down and didn’t notice Billy standing there and almost ran him over.”

“That was the hardest ball I ever saw hit,” Martin complimented his buddy.

The ball was eventually recovered in the back yard of a house across a major thoroughfare and four houses up a bisecting street, some 562 feet from home plate. Scuffed in two spots, the ball finally stopped in the backyard of a house, about 565 feet from home plate.

In one of the best trades in baseball history, Patterson traded the Mantle home run ball for one dollar and three new baseballs to be autographed by the Yankee players.

So was Mantle who said: “If I send the ball home, I know what will happen to it. My twin brothers will take it out on the lot, like any 20-cent rocket.” Chuck Stobbs was not happy. “Mickey didn’t get a hit every time he faced me. I got him out a few times, too.”

Yankees PR director Red Patterson was happy and also went into the history books. He coined the term “tape measure home run” by measuring the distance with his size 11 shoes and estimated the distance of that monster shot.

Mantle’s shot may be the most famous home run ever hit. The Guinness Book of World Records lists it as the longest home run to be measured at the time it was hit.

HF

Harvey Frommer is the author of 34 sports books, including the classics: “New York City Baseball,” “Shoeless Joe and Ragtime Baseball,” “Rickey and Robinson: The Men Who Broke Baseball’s Color Line,” “The New York Yankee Encyclopedia,” “A Yankee Century: A Celebration of the First Hundred Years of Baseball’s Greatest Team,” and the updated and revised 2005 edition of “Red Sox Vs. Yankees: The Great Rivalry” (with Frederic J. Frommer). Frommer sports books are available - discounted and autographed - direct from the author.

Opening Day or night 2005

Sunday, April 3rd, 2005

2005 an Opening Day like none other in our lifetimes. How does one react as a Red Sox fan? Does it really matter if they lose this year? All that matters is that every game you could look at the flag pole and see the World Championship flag blowing in the wind. All those years of “1918″ will be gone. No more Curse. It is finally off me. I was at Bucky, Buckner and Boone. Today it is time to stop showing Roberts sliding into second. It is time to stop thinking about the past and think about the future. Today is Opening Day, but why are they playing at night? TV has tried to ruin baseball. I think it is really football that hates baseball. When Pete Rozelle had the first Super Bowl his goal was to make it bigger than the World Series. Since then the NFL has conspired with TV to make MLB showcase the sport at the wrong times. It is because of the NFL that baseball had the most exciting moment in the 2004 post season to come on live at 1:22 in the morning. The year before the first playoff game Boston played ended on a suicide squeeze at 2:45 A.M. Now instead of playing on a beautiful Sunday afternoon, TV and football make the Red Sox and Yankees start at 8 at night. Baseball needs to control their own destiny. Play the games when the fans can stay awake and watch them. Start all post season at 6. Why play at 2 in the morning? Let the kids watch their heroes, not see the highlights the next morning. Play the game for the fans, not television. Even tonight’s game should start at 6 not 8, how many kids will have to go to bed in the 5th inning tonight, because mommy says ” remember you lost an hour of sleep last night and tomorrow 6 is going to really be 5, so turn off the TV, I don’t care if the bases are loaded and the score is tied: I said GO TO BED NOW!”

Why can’t baseball be for the kids?

The Fan’s Commish

Rick Swanson

Drop the anti and return the trust

Friday, April 1st, 2005

I know the Yankees are responsible for $9 million of Vasquez, and $5 million of Contreras $17 owed, but does that count toward the luxury tax number, or revenue sharing? It is predicted that with a total salary of $200 million NY will pay $30 million in luxury tax, and $70 million in revenue sharing for a salary total of $300 million for the 2005 year. Since their franchise value is $ 832 million, they dwarf the field, and once again prove that they have a monopoly on the game. Now comes the latest, the Debt Service rule. The Yankees, according to some owners, were carrying significant debt and were out of compliance with the debt service rule. Thus, like all offenders, they are subject to sanctions. This could mean that NY will have a soft cap for 2006. They will be restricted to only $200 million next year. This is where Congress needs to play hardball. If they just drop that Antitrust exemption, then NY could not keep the monopoly that they now enjoy. With NY paying a guaranteed $580 million through 2010, that number represents close to 1/4 of all of MLB. In 2005 NY will have 13 players that make a total of $165 million which is 10% of all the teams in baseball combined. Every team needs a chance to win, but NY has a monopoly on baseball. The words of the Blue Ribbon Report have never been more accurate than they are right now. Created in 2000 by MLB the panel was Richard Levin, Paul Volcker, George Mitchell, and George Will. They created the Blue Ribbon report in 2000. the report said:
A well-managed club that demonstrates baseball acumen should allow its fans a reasonable hope that their club will be able to play and win in the postseason. This standard is not arbitrary. It matches the views of most fans of baseball and other major professional sports. One of baseball’s oldest and cherished notions is that hope springs eternal, and that every club is a contender at least in spring training. If a club’s season ended in futility, the fans’ rallying cry was always, “Wait till next year,” because a new season always brought renewed hope. The realization that fans may now feel defeated before the first game in a majority of MLB communities is a cause for grave concern.
I.3. Payroll Disparities Not surprisingly, widening revenue disparities have been accompanied by widening payroll disparities: In 1999, one club had a payroll approximately equal to the sum of the payrolls of the lowest five payroll clubs.
I.5. Other Findings and Conclusions
Sports leagues do not function as free markets. If they did, the clubs would be clustered in a few large markets. Rather, sports leagues are blends of cooperation and competition—cooperation for the sake of producing satisfactory competitiveness. MLB has enjoyed a long-standing exemption from anti-trust laws that govern other
industries. MLB and other professional sports leagues operate under rules which have withstood legal scrutiny. These rules are intended to protect the public interest by enabling franchises in communities of varying sizes and with different market conditions to compete against each other with a reasonable opportunity to succeed.
The goal of a well-designed league is to produce adequate competitive balance. By this standard, MLB is not now well-designed. In the context of baseball, proper competitive balance should be understood to exist when there are no clubs chronically weak because of MLB’s structural features.

The Yankees may not win it all in 2005, but they certainly have a reasonable hope of reaching postseason play. We the fans need to tell Congress to revoke the antitrust laws. Tell them baseball needs trust not anti trust. Write to all the owners of baseball except king George. I did in January, with many teams responding back. The president of the Blue Jays sent me this: “I am sympathetic to the fact that the present revenue sharing formula and luxury tax has not produced the competitive balance that is necessary for all teams to have a fair chance at winning. Either the formula has to change or some form of cost-certainty must take place in order to achieve that goal.” The Padres ownership wrote this: “Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this important matter. The padres are typically perceived as a “small market team” and accordingly, have been clear about the need to inject some financial sensibility into the industry.”
It is up to us the fans of the game to change the game for the betterment of all, not just one team, the NY Yankees. Stop the Yankees from monopolizing the great game of baseball. Every other team should be banding together, in creating a system that is equal for all teams. Heed the words of the Blue Ribbon Report:

Proper competitive balance will not exist until every well-run club has a regularly recurring reasonable hope of reaching postseason play.

I am the Fan’s Commish

Now let’s play ball, but let’s play fair

Rick Swanson


Copyright 2005-2006. All Rights Reserved.
Part of the
Baseball Almanac family: 755HomeRuns | Baseball Box Scores | Baseball Fever | Today in Baseball History.

Baseball Almanac
Privacy Policy.